Post by account_disabled on Dec 3, 2023 4:51:05 GMT
Tn three years of operation, its usefulness. At the time of its application, the regulation aimed to protect users' personal data. It then became urgent to act in this way, as certain abuses had been observed. We remember in particular the Cambridge Analytica scandal, characterized in 2014 by the misappropriation, analysis and usurpatory reuse of personal data for electoral purposes on Facebook.
From 2018, in Europe, change is immediate. The new management imposed by the GDPR allows users to consent to the triggering of cookies when they enter a site. The GDPR thus consolidates the rights of Country Email List individuals, via measures such as the right to be forgotten or the portability of personal data. It also allows those responsible for processing personal data to be held accountable and improves data regulation, particularly on the international scene. From now on, anyone can contact the CNIL to make a “ notification of a personal data violation”.
Proof of a real need: the CNIL recorded nearly 14,000 complaints in 2019 alone, an increase of 27% compared to 2018. This has not been denied since. A mixed boaty mcboatfaceessment Does this mean that the GDPR constitutes an ideal framework? We can undoubtedly estimate that it still has room for improvement and that it could be improved on a few points. At issue: cookies. These text files stored locally on our computer when we visit web pages prove essential to our use of the Internet and help improve the security of our credentials.
In most cases, these are session cookies, i.e. elements that are intended to be deleted within a certain period of time. But unfortunately they can also be persistent and remain active beyond closing Safari, Mozilla, Chrome or Microsoft Edge… Furthermore, our use of the GDPR can turn out to be mechanical. Indeed, few Internet users carefully read the conditions of use to which the GDPR subjects them. In most cases, they accept the use of cookies offered to them without fail, at the risk of exposing their personal data. Thus, “tracking cookies” have become a real headache for those who value their privacy online. What should we accept? What are we risking? Enough to minimize the effects of the GDPR.
From 2018, in Europe, change is immediate. The new management imposed by the GDPR allows users to consent to the triggering of cookies when they enter a site. The GDPR thus consolidates the rights of Country Email List individuals, via measures such as the right to be forgotten or the portability of personal data. It also allows those responsible for processing personal data to be held accountable and improves data regulation, particularly on the international scene. From now on, anyone can contact the CNIL to make a “ notification of a personal data violation”.
Proof of a real need: the CNIL recorded nearly 14,000 complaints in 2019 alone, an increase of 27% compared to 2018. This has not been denied since. A mixed boaty mcboatfaceessment Does this mean that the GDPR constitutes an ideal framework? We can undoubtedly estimate that it still has room for improvement and that it could be improved on a few points. At issue: cookies. These text files stored locally on our computer when we visit web pages prove essential to our use of the Internet and help improve the security of our credentials.
In most cases, these are session cookies, i.e. elements that are intended to be deleted within a certain period of time. But unfortunately they can also be persistent and remain active beyond closing Safari, Mozilla, Chrome or Microsoft Edge… Furthermore, our use of the GDPR can turn out to be mechanical. Indeed, few Internet users carefully read the conditions of use to which the GDPR subjects them. In most cases, they accept the use of cookies offered to them without fail, at the risk of exposing their personal data. Thus, “tracking cookies” have become a real headache for those who value their privacy online. What should we accept? What are we risking? Enough to minimize the effects of the GDPR.